The students in my classes may have only three items on their desks during lessons: a notebook, writing utensils, and the current coursebook. Electronic devices and technological tools—no matter how educational—are not allowed; this includes traditional textbooks as well, which I see as mere summaries of literature’s deep intricacies. Instead, we aim for an environment where individuals gather at a table to ponder over and delve into significant works together.
The classroom I’m discussing has a distinctly traditional feel. At my present university, the University of Austin, we prioritize a classic Great Books education within our programs. Simultaneously, we explore cutting-edge curriculum areas such as STEM and technology, which are leading innovations in higher education today. Some may think these guidelines apply solely to humanities courses or similar liberal arts subjects. Wouldn’t advanced technologies be essential for fields focused heavily on technological advancement? Absolutely, particularly concerning practical applications in those domains. However, what defines technology is innovation—new concepts—and generating fresh perspectives requires genuine freedom of thought, contemplating how we process information itself. Thus, broad-based educational approaches underpin all forms of study instead of merely serving as one type of schooling alongside others.
Ideas emerge within us solely when our previous beliefs prove insufficient. Thus, thinking commences from an awareness of voids—moments where we realize our lack of knowledge. Such situations can feel unstable yet hold immense significance. Our response to these moments marks arguably the most critical choice in our existence. Thought stands as the noblest function of the human spirit; hence, how we address the necessity for innovative ideas shapes the essence of our being. These decisions carry profound implications—in truth, none more significant exists.
High-tech gadgets like tablets and computers certainly serve purposes for both reading and taking notes. However, these tools often lure us into various diversions and readily available solutions found online. Implementing a rule that restricts such devices—but allowing exemptions for those requiring special assistance or dealing with urgent personal issues—might be likened to utilizing training wheels when learning how to cycle. Over time, one might become adept at managing their use so that they can engage in digital reading and notetaking without succumbing to distractions or seeking quick answers; essentially removing the training wheels. Nonetheless, doing away entirely with potential interruptions overlooks an essential aspect.
Aristotle noted that intellectual virtues demand fewer resources compared to moral virtues. For instance, liberality necessitates abundance, whereas true understanding happens best in isolation and self-sufficiency, requiring almost no external support. Frequently, during contemplation, we may shut our eyes or gaze into space blankly. Traditional tools like books, notebooks, and pencils often fade from view, along with peers around us. This approach teaches students that their most elevated engagement takes place in solitude. Consequently, this implies that, correctly interpreted, there are no initial aids needed; just like mastering cycling without training wheels, one doesn’t reach a point where thinking becomes automatic.
STEM students, in particular, could benefit from this insight. Contemporary science often simplifies all aspects of human cognition through mathematical models. This approach was pioneered by René Descartes during solitary confinement in a wintery hut when he lacked proper tools. He also embraced introspective contemplation akin to monastic practices. Do today’s young scholars in STEM fields get similar encouragement to withdraw inwardly? Traditional educational settings remind these learners about what their predecessor Descartes understood—despite needing various instruments for research, they must recognize that at advanced levels, inquiry should be liberated: unshackled from gadgets, devoid of urgent demands, uninhibited by presuppositions, allowing unfettered exploration.
This serves as a reminder to them that technological thought, being a human activity, happens within a broader human framework. Naturally, students pursuing STEM fields ought to frequently recall this fact through their studies; thus, they should enhance their curriculum with subjects from the humanities and social sciences. Additionally, they should have this reality reinforced for them through direct experiences and teachings outside purely technical disciplines. how They learn. In an old-fashioned classroom setting, students are treated with respect by being regarded as complete individuals. This environment encourages them to reflect inwardly and honestly evaluate their character as scholars.
This prompts them to pose challenging inquiries regarding their own lives. When confronted with feelings of void and an apparent lack of direction ahead, what actions do you take? In dealing with this disquieting realization of your own ignorance, how do you free yourself? Is it through retreating back to outdated notions, bolstered by flawed reasoning? Alternatively, can you modestly acknowledge your lack of knowledge, embracing the distressing obscurity of doubt and confusion? Furthermore, are you capable of mustering the bravery needed to navigate through these murky waters using only the faint illumination provided by your thoughts as guidance?
During such times, a traditional classroom compels students to delve deeper into their reading, engage in more thoughtful discussions, and cultivate bolder thinking. This environment prompts them to confront their identities and potential as individuals. By focusing mainly on self-awareness and interpersonal connections instead of succumbing to the allure of digital devices, this approach underscores the essence of being human at the core of education.
Alex Priou serves as an Associate Professor of Political Philosophy at the University of Austin. He has authored various works on the subject. Musings on Plato's Symposium , and he co-hosts "The New Thinkery," a podcast focused on political philosophy.
The opinions stated in this piece belong solely to the author.
Related Articles
- Does the Wealthiest Nation in the World Prioritize Its Children? | Opinion
- Project 2025 Will Transform Education as We Know It | Opinion
- Kamala Harris Punished Parents for Crimes | Opinion
Start your unlimited Pawonation.comtrial
Post a Comment