The Top Stable Shoes for All Kinds of Runs (2025)
These 12 cutting-edge running shoes will maintain your stability without compromising comfort or slowing you down.
At a Glance
- The New Era of Stability
- Key Features to Seek in a Stability Shoe
- Beyond the Shoe
- What Shoes We Included
- How We Tested
- Best All-Around: Asics Kayano 31 ($165)
- Runner-up Best All-Around: Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 ($164)
- Best Plush Stability: PumaForeverRUN Nitro 2 ($150)
- Runner-up Best Plush: Diadora Nucleo 2 ($160)
- Best Firm, Responsive Support: Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 ($140)
- Runner-up Best Firm Support: Topo UltraFly 5 ($140)
- Most Invisible Support: Altra Experience Form ($145)
- Best Full-Foot Support: New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 ($140)
- Best for Racing: Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 ($140)
- Best for Up-Tempo Days: Saucony Tempus 2 ($160)
- Best for Going Long: Coast to Mountain P1 ($160)
- Best for Recovery Days: Hoka Gaviota 5 ($175)
The New Era of Balance Footwear
Determining what constitutes a stability running shoe has become more challenging. This complexity is actually beneficial. In the past, identifying such shoes was straightforward; they featured a firm, dark-colored foam under the mid-foot area known as a medial post, intended to prevent overpronation—the unnecessary inward turning of the heel during movement. During use, these shoes were recognizable due to their rigid, bulky, and highly controlled feel. However, this is not always true today.
Modern stability shoes are highly cushioned, providing a seamless ride without bulky control features. They have become so refined that they offer similar comfort to both neutral runners and those requiring additional support. Instead of rigid medial posts, manufacturers now employ various subtle and seamlessly integrated techniques to assist runners with pronation issues.
It's high time, considering that the science It has been demonstrated since the 1990s that excessive pronation seldom causes issues, and conventional motion-control approaches have done little to manage this excess movement. However, transformation within the industry and among populations deeply entrenched in these practices has progressed gradually. pronation paradigm Although the demand for stability shoes and the variety of such models has significantly declined over the last ten years, substantial changes in their appearance and performance have only emerged recently.
Stability depends on numerous factors including the design of the sole, the thickness of the cushioning layer, the firmness of the midsole, the material used for the outer sole, the type of upper materials and their structure — not only medial posting," explains Kurt Stockbridge, who serves as the vice president of product development at Skechers. "These various elements can be adjusted individually to create a highly stable shoe without necessarily conforming to conventional designs.
The latest stability shoe designs acknowledge that each component of the footwear influences how you run. These innovations aim to minimize the imbalance created by the shoe’s design, which can separate your feet further from the ground. Interestingly, numerous neutral shoes—those typically not labeled or promoted as stability options—are now incorporating sturdier bases to counteract the unsteadiness associated with thicker, softer midsoles.
Key Features to Seek in a Stability Shoe
When recommending stability shoes to my patients, I advise them to seek out those with a straight last design," explains Dr. Paul Langer, a sports podiatrist at Twin Cities Orthopedics and former president of the American Association of Podiatric Sports Medicine. A straight-last shoe features an internal structure that creates a continuous straight line along the sole from heel to forefoot, providing comprehensive support beneath the arch. "In truly straight-last footwear, you wouldn't be able to distinguish between what would otherwise appear as separate left and right shoes due to their symmetrical construction," notes Langer. The lesser curvature present in these designs correlates directly with increased overall stability."
Langer views this expansive platform as more significant compared to the thicker medial post, which has traditionally determined the stability classification. "When discussing stability, I'm likely focusing more on the design of the shoe rather than the support aspect," he explains.
This applies equally to other stabilization elements such as guide rails, frames, plates, or heel counters. "I worry less about these components," Langer states, citing studies indicating that such devices do not manage or rectify overpronation issues. Nonetheless, he acknowledges the value of stabilization techniques, noting they may reduce some instability brought on by compressing into softer foam materials. "Stabilization footwear does not fix problems," Langer clarifies. "It simply tends to be slightly more stable compared to regular shoes."
Langer also mentions, "I aim to assist my patients in grasping that a padded shoe naturally offers less stability compared to walking without footwear." When you land with a force equivalent to two to three times your body weight onto an extensive layer of soft foam, this material will inevitably compress unevenly due to its inherent properties, thereby amplifying any irregularities. Hence, despite numerous shoes now being crafted with straighter, fuller forms, both the thickness and firmness of the foam should still be taken into account.
Identifying the perfect blend of cushioning, design, and support characteristics requires testing several shoe models and figuring out which one suits you best. provides optimal comfort for your step and pace . This “ comfort filter , serves as our best starting point according to Langer. This involves evaluating which shoes offer the most natural alignment.
Emily Stefanski, a sports podiatrist at Coastline Foot and Ankle serving Connecticut and Rhode Island, who was also a Division 1 college long-distance runner before becoming a marathon runner, agrees. She states, "My advice to patients is to choose whatever feels most comfortable for their feet." However, she adds, "While I do have certain recommendations based on what I believe will be effective, these aren’t set in stone because numerous variables come into play."
Past the Sole: Diversity and Resilience
Keep in mind that even when you find a shoe that complements your stride it should not be your sole pair of shoes . A handful of studies show that runners have a lower risk of injury when cycling through different pairs of shoes. “More important than finding the perfect shoe is appreciating that your feet need to stay strong and adaptable through having variety in your footwear and allowing your feet to have different stresses and loads,” Langer says. So find a stability shoe that feels right for you as your daily trainer, but also have a minimalist shoe (even if just for walking or yard work), and sometimes run in a low, flexible trainer as well as a cushy, rockered one.
Stefanski additionally mentions, "I consistently aim to emphasize a significant amount of strength training." Coaches, physical therapists, biomechanists, and podiatrists concur that excessive pronation and other stability problems often arise due to strength and mobility problems , and this issue frequently gets resolved by enhancing your technique across the entire sequence from your feet to your hips. Stafanski remarks, "I think we have the potential to enhance our performance over time, and many individuals don’t necessarily require constant support from their footwear; they could transition away from wearing supportive shoes—I wonder how dedicated folks are to performing these exercises."
What Shoes We Included
Due to the flexible interpretation of what constitutes a stable shoe, the guidelines for compiling a list of "stability shoes" inherently involve some subjectivity. We decided to feature only those models equipped with specific structures or designs intended to control the foot's movement during motion.
We didn't incorporate plated shoes into this guide, even though certain runners believe that the arched plates in top-tier running shoes and training shoes offer enough support for their steps. Stefanski mentions, "With my highly flexible athletes, I've observed that fitting them into carbon-plated footwear works perfectly; they require nothing more." On the contrary, others discover that these plated shoes intensify their unsteadiness. each super shoe performs differently ).
Consider this compilation as a selection of footwear crafted particularly for individuals requiring—or desiring—assistance in preventing excessive rotation of their feet. However, understand that this list is neither comprehensive nor restrictive. There might be alternative designs featuring broad base supports and midsole structures tailored to minimize side-to-side force and facilitate smoother movement from heel strike to push off, potentially offering similar stability.
The Methodology Behind Our Testing of Stability Shoes
After running in dozens of new shoe models this year, I sorted out those with stability features and completed multiple runs in each of them at a variety of distances and paces. Most models were also run in by more than 20 wear-testers who help select and inform the reviews in our best running shoe round-ups.
Here’s my background: I have been involved in running since the latter part of the 1970s and have worked as both an editor and shoe reviewer for a running magazine starting from 2000. Additionally, I am the writer of several publications. Your Best Stride , and Run Strong, Stay Hungry Once upon a time, I was a consistent runner who could complete marathons at a pace under 2 hours and 46 minutes, logging over 50 miles each week. However, due to persistent injuries and advancing years, both my mileage and speed have taken quite a hit. These same issues have made finding appropriate shoe designs particularly challenging for me. The arch on my left foot is naturally high and requires minimal intervention, whereas my right foot needs more substantial support because of past strain-related problems. Unfortunately, excessive medial support can cause discomfort in my right knee since it tends to roll inward when stressed—a result of an ongoing issue. Given all this complexity, I seem perfectly positioned to put some innovative, adaptable stability solutions through their paces; they claim to adjust according to your specific support demands.
Best Stability Shoes 2025
Best All-Around
Asics GEL-Kayano 31
$165 at Amazon (Men’s) $165 at Amazon (Women’s)
Weight: 10.8 oz (men’s), 9.5 oz (women’s)
Stack Height: 40–30 mm (men’s); 39–29 mm (women’s)
Drop: 10 mm
Stability Strategy: Plush, highly responsive inner post. Broad, outward-sloping foundation. Carved midsole.
The 30th-anniversary edition of the Kayano showcased one of the most significant shifts in stability technology within the footwear industry last year. Over thirty years, the Kayano series had maintained control over runners' strides through robust elements like a pronounced medial post and a rigid midfoot bridging system. However, for the Kayano 30—and continuing into the Kayano 31—these strong stabilizing components were substituted with innovative geometrical designs and more subtle methods aimed at guiding the foot naturally without imposing constraints.
The platform extends broadly from the heel to the toes and expands further underneath the ball of the foot. On the outer part of the heel, it is designed with contours that allow for greater compression, which helps smooth and decelerate the shift from initial heel strike to mid-stance. On the inner side, an opposing protrusion minimizes compression, while the midsole rises around the heel area to offer containment and slight support.
The most distinctive feature is a section of softer, low-density yet very reactive foam located beneath the arch. This area previously featured a firm medial post in earlier models. According to Asics, the softness of this new segment enables it to compress upon loading, thereby expanding the effective width of the midfoot. Additionally, since this material has a higher rebound compared to the primary platform, it helps guide your foot back into an optimal position during the transition from mid-stance.
This new insert is based on research indicating that it isn’t the level of pronation which makes runners susceptible to injuries but rather something else. duration of time at maximum foot pronation Therefore, rather than attempting to prevent the foot's rotation, the shoe swiftly brings it back to a centered position.
While running, I failed to see the bump beneath the arch initially. However, I distinctly sensed its impact as my weight shifted onto the front part of my foot, giving me an upright and centered stance, prepared for a solid takeoff. Primarily, what stood out was the shoe's width—it offered ample room without being overly spacious and provided reliable support during each step and roll. Even with a 40mm heel stack, I never felt elevated since there wasn't any wobble factor; instead, the balance between softness and responsiveness along with unexpectedly pliable toes contributed significantly. Although the pace seemed moderate rather than speedy, the stride remained fluid and free from stiffness. Both my unevenly shaped feet were comfortably cradled and reinforced throughout the journey, which became increasingly noticeable as fatigue set in during extended sessions.
The 31’s new, engineered mesh upper complemented the smooth ride and secured my foot comfortably with plush, but not excessive, padding. Asics also reduced the lateral heel flare, which created some unwanted rotational torque on landing in the Kayano 30, leaving a beveled curve that eased my foot down to the ground even with a heavy heel strike.
Altogether, the Kayano 31 is a shoe that can be worn by nearly any runner and delivers comfort and support that not only stays out of the way but also seems to reduce fatigue.
Runner-up Best All-Around
Brooks Glycerin GTS 22
$165 at REI (Men’s) $165 at REI (Women’s)
Weight: 10.7 ounces for men, 9.5 ounces for women
Stack Height: 38–28 mm (forefoot)
Drop: 10 mm
Stability Strategy: GuidesRails technology. Adjusted midsole foam. Broad, straight design.
We awarded the Glycerin GTS 21 as "The Best Overall Stability Shoe" last year due to its excellent combination of cushioning and supportive stability within our extensive review of running shoes. For the updated 22 model, Brooks has retained their well-known GuideRails—which consist of elevated walls near the upper part of the midsole around the back foot area, with sturdier construction on one side—and introduced an innovative feature: specially calibrated midsole foam.
What sets apart Brooks' nitrogen-filled adjustable midsole, which we First spotted in September’s Glycerin Max. , which means it is softer on the outside and firmer on the inner part—a significantly firmer feel in both the heel and particularly in the forefoot—within the same piece of foam. This new technology enables Brooks to adjust the characteristics of various sections within a foam midsole as they produce it.
Carson Caprara, who serves as the senior vice president of footwear at Brooks, mentions that they introduce two distinct chemical formulations into the midsole mold prior to initiating the supercritical gas-infusion procedure. "When this mixture encounters the high-pressure nitrogen infusion," he elaborates, "the resulting cellular structures behave differently—the internal cells remain relatively compact whereas the external ones expand significantly, leading to increased suppleness and flexibility. This entire process occurs seamlessly, eliminating the presence of seams and ridges. Consequently, it provides a uniform feel across the sole."
Brooks adjusts the foam such that the midsole contains a greater proportion of larger cells in the heel for better shock absorption during landing. Then, this composition shifts towards predominantly smaller cells in the responsive forefoot area. This design yields a running experience that seems softer when the external foam absorbs impacts and compresses upon contact with the ground, yet firmer as your bodyweight seamlessly moves from the heel through the forefoot, providing push-off power. In the updated version compared to the Glycerin 21, I noticed enhanced protection coupled with increased responsiveness in my stride; hence, propelling forward was agile and effortless. As a consequence, the miles seemed to pass quicker than anticipated.
The integration of guide rails at the back, combined with sturdier, adjusted cushioning upfront and a somewhat fuller contour beneath the arch, provided largely unobtrusive stabilization throughout each step—from heel strike to pushoff. However, I noticed increased pressure from the guide rail underfoot compared to earlier models, particularly towards the forefoot area where the denser padding underneath intensified this sensation. For my pronated foot needing extra assistance, this offered reassuring support; yet, it seemed overly restrictive for feet without such issues. Despite these features making the Glycerin 22 less versatile overall, they do make it an excellent option specifically for individuals seeking guided motion control. Thus, we didn’t designate it as our top all-rounder pick due to limited adaptability across different gait types.
Best Plush Stability
Puma ForeverRUN Nitro 2
$150 at The RunningWarehouse (for Men) $150 at The Running Warehouse (for Women)
Weight: 10.7 oz (for men); oz (for women)
Stack Height: 38–28 mm
Drop: 10 mm
Stability Strategy: Sturdier foam structure. Broad, angular design.
Puma’s nitrogen-enhanced TPE foam provides an exceptionally smooth experience for your step, effectively softening landing impacts and facilitating a springy push-off. In the ForeverRUN Nitro 2 model, they utilize two distinct densities of this foam—an inner layer with a softer composition surrounded by a more rigid outer section—aiming to enhance stability throughout each movement without attempting to restrict foot motion. According to Conor Cashin, who holds the position of senior product line manager at Puma, "Our investigation into the the rate at which runners were experiencing overpronation And we genuinely attempted to concentrate on reducing that pace while still permitting runners to pronate to some degree, as this is the body's innate method of absorbing impact.
In this revised edition, the two foams are integrated via co-molding instead of being layered and bonded, resulting in a more seamless interaction. "By extending the soft nitro foam from the base up through the midsole," explains Cashin, "we achieve enhanced cushioning and responsiveness." He adds, "The firmer nitro foam surrounding the foot provides the necessary stability."
The sole has been notably broadened —especially beneath the arch in the midfoot area—to improve steadiness, and it’s also increased by two millimeters for added comfort underfoot. However, the real standout feature of this footwear lies in its specially designed, circular-knit upper which cradles your feet exceptionally well. It features padded collars that snugly embrace the heels, stretches gently yet firmly over the rest of the foot, and secures the midfoot using lightweight, printed reinforcement panels.
While running, the initial impression was formed by how smoothly the shoes cushioned my steps (consistent with expectations) without disrupting my natural gait. Despite their elevated profile beneath my feet, they remained steady due to the broad platform and stiffer edge design. The firm sensation under my main toe offered additional stability as my foot moved forward, enhancing each push-off. Although these shoes excel on relaxed outings because of their soft padding, their responsive midsoles allow them to perform adequately during faster-paced sessions such as tempo runs or sprints without hindering performance.
Runner-up, Plush Stability
Diadora Nucleo 2
$160 at Diadora (Men’s) $160 at Diadora (Women’s)
Weight: 9.7 ounces for men; 7.4 ounces for women
Stack Height: 35–30 mm
Drop: 5 mm
Stability Strategy: Uneven geometric design. Broad, linear form. Side panels. Reactive cushioning material.
After running with the Nucleo 2, my initial comment on the test summary read: "a smooth and comfortable ride—it’s both cushioned and supportive." This plush feel comes largely from the thick foam beneath the balls and tips of the feet due to its modest 5-millimeter heel-to-toe offset, which allows for gentle sinking-in followed by rapid, late-stage rocking motion. Meanwhile, the shoe offers solid support thanks to the responsive nature of this foam; as you step down, it compresses but then springs back quickly, giving your foot an energetic foundation underneath.
Stability is achieved through geometric design: the broad midsole foam features cut-out sections on Pawnation.com to permit additional compression, while these areas beneath the arch are reinforced to reduce excess softness and enhance support. Elevated walls on either side of the shoe softly embrace and align the back part of your foot.
While running, what stood out most was the soft foam beneath the midfoot which offered support without feeling too solid or intrusive—it gave me a reassuring sensation of stability. The generously cushioned upper and tongue cradled my foot comfortably yet kept it firmly in place. However, I did notice one drawback: the sides of the heel counter at Pawnation.com were somewhat wide, leading to an uncomfortable twist during initial contact when landing slowly with a forceful heel strike.
The Nucleo 2’s stability guidance is subtle enough a neutral runner wouldn’t notice it, making this daily trainer versatile enough for all but those needing strong, rotational support. I found myself reaching for this shoe both on days when I wanted comfort and days when I was ready to cruise.
Best for Firm, Responsive Support
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24
$140 at REI (Men’s) $140 at REI (Women’s)
Weight: 8.0 ounces (for women); 10.0 ounces (for men)
Stack Height: 35.5–23.5 mm
Drop: 12 mm
Stability Strategy: Guiding rails. Broad, direct foundation. Sturdy reactive midsole.
In 2019, Brooks revamped the Adrenaline, their iconic stability shoe, by removing the thick, full-height medial post and introducing GuideRails instead. This innovation can be seen across all their supportive footwear models today. GuideRails consist of elevated strips of firmer foam located atop the midsole; these run along both sides of the sole from the heel to midway under the arch. On the inner side, near the arch, this firm strip helps prevent excessive inward rolling, whereas it matches the rest of the midsole’s density on the outer edge, preventing lateral slippage at the heel. Compared to traditional posts, GuideRails offer enhanced comfort through reduced weight and improved smoothness during runs. Additionally, because they activate selectively based on movement needs rather than constantly correcting alignment, they cater effectively to a broader spectrum of runners.
[The GuideRail] does not extend entirely to the ground, allowing for some movement," explains Jon Teipen, who serves as the principal footwear product line manager at Brooks. "This isn't a rigid support on the inner side of the shoe. As you roll your foot inward more and more, the GuideRail responds with greater resistance.
This season's Adrenaline features an updated nitrogen-filled EVA-blend midsole foam that is both lighter and significantly softer, yet remains calibrated for more than just cushioning, resulting in a notably responsive ride. Its engineered mesh upper ensures a snug and comfy fit, wrapping around the midfoot thanks to a dual-layer reinforced arch section while maintaining breathability and flexibility at the forefront. With a 12-millimeter heel-to-toe offset, average stack height, pliable toe box, and evident support beneath the arch—a feature enhanced this year with a straighter build—the Adrenaline 24 offers the most conventional stability-oriented experience among these models.
Nevertheless, compared to the rigid and cumbersome versions from before, I discovered that the ride was smooth and unobtrusive, offering mild supportive cradling around the rearfoot. The cushioning and support appeared particularly effective during heel strikes and throughout strides; however, they also performed well under faster paces where I remained on my toes. Thanks to this adaptability and reliable support, the Adrenaline can effortlessly become my everyday training shoe.
Second-place for Best Firm, Outstanding Customer Service
Topo UltraFly 5
$140 at REI (Men’s) $140 at REI (Women’s)
Weight: 9.9 ounces for men, 8.0 ounces for women
Stack Height: 30–25 mm
Drop: 5 mm
Stability Strategy: Midline posting. Ample forefoot width featuring significant big toe flare. Minimal heel-to-toe drop. Linear form.
The Topo UltraFly 5's long-lasting shoe fuses classic elements such as a medial post with a sleek, minimalistic aesthetic. Much of the stable feel during runs comes from its broad front section (especially around the big toe area), the slight 5mm heel-toe difference, and medium-thick yet reactive cushioning. Additionally, there is an added segment of denser foam beneath the arch aimed at minimizing compression and twisting motions. However, this supportive zone only extends halfway up the midsole where it is tallest underneath the arch before gradually decreasing towards both the toes and the rear end. Together, these components offered me a soft but secure sensation throughout each stride, allowing for natural motion rather than restricting it.
While running, the standout feature was the ample room in the front part of the shoe: the upper design allowed my toes to spread naturally, making it comfortable to wear full CorrectToes. Additionally, the broad foundation provided stability and ensured a secure footing during takeoff, eliminating any feeling of instability. This athletic posture is further improved by the lightweight, reactive ZipFoam used in Topo’s sole, which cushions impacts sufficiently yet maintains close-to-ground responsiveness. The snug fit around the midfoot complemented the openness at the forefront, allowing me to enjoy comfort without worrying about slippage.
It’s not the sveltest shoe, but it rides lightly even while protecting and supporting. Every time I wore it I felt my stride quicken and my awareness of my stride sharpen, making me more efficient as the run went on. My toes and feet engaged and my posture got taller. No matter how tired I was when I started (and I loved these on recovery days when feeling beat-up), I was always sad to end my runs in the UltraFly 5.
Most Invisible Support
Altra Experience Form
$145 at REI (Men’s) $145 at REI (Women’s)
Weight: 9.6 ounces (for men), 7.8 ounces (for women)
Stack Height: 32–28 mm for men; 30–26 mm for women
Drop: 4 mm
Stability Strategy: GuidesRails. Spacious toe box. Minimal heel-to-toe offset. Linear design.
Every Altra shoe ensures stability via a well-balanced, low-offset design paired with an ample toe box that permits natural foot splay and maintains a supportive stance. By doing so, this brand can utilize plush, responsive cushioning instead of inflexible midsoles and strict motion-control features—predating many competitors' experiments with different geometries.
Their latest addition to the 4mm drop lineup, known as the Experience Form, incorporates guide rails along both edges of the heel for enhanced stability. An increased sidewall height on one side matches the firmness found throughout the midsole, resulting in an enveloping sensation that subtly prevents excessive foot movement without exerting restrictive force. At the bottom, a straight foundation design features additional material under the arch compared to previous versions, offering comprehensive support across the entire foot. The upper section utilizes structured mesh fabric which maintains simplicity yet ensures snug fitment around the rear and middle parts of the foot while remaining unobtrusive towards the forefoot area.
I discovered that the Experience Form’s ride is plush yet reactive, offering a more firm feel compared to numerous contemporary footwear options due to its moderate cushioning with CMEVA material. This makes the shoe lightweight and agile, promoting swift interactions with the ground and an effortless transition from heel strike to toe-off. It incorporates a mild rocking motion alongside flexible properties that mimic natural movement. Stability elements remain seamless during runs without interfering; however, they provide noticeable support when making sharp movements at various speeds. Regardless of my intended speed, these shoes encouraged me to accelerate frequently throughout each session, appreciating their blend of agility, comfortable connection, and understated reinforcement.
Best Full-Foot Support
New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14
$140 at REI (Men’s) $140 at REI (Women’s)
Weight: 10.7 ounces (for men), 8.6 ounces (for women)
Stack Height: 35.5–27.5 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Stability Strategy: Slanted plate featuring a double-layered midsole. Broad, straight foundation.
Every one of the integrated shank plates that are currently trending in modern running footwear primarily serves to provide stability to the cushioning and bounce created by the use of high volumes of soft and reactive foam. Similar to those discovered in racing shoes meant for marathons, these components generally aim at enhancing performance and support during runs. super shoes Focus on improving your forward rolls and push-offs; others mainly help control side-to-side movement, such as Skechers' winglets and H-shaped supports, or the midfoot wings found on the plastic plate of the Saucony Endorphin Speed.
In the redesigned New Balance 860, the plate introduces an enhanced approach to rotational guidance compared to the conventional rigid medial support. Featuring a flexible EVA layer—previously showcased in the Vongo—that sits between two foam sections (a softer material atop firmer foam)—this design inclines such that it stands taller medially near the arch area and shorter laterally. Consequently, this forms a base where stiffer foam supports underneath the inner part of the foot and creates a surface above with extra padding on the outer, striking zone. Additionally, the plate includes hexagonal perforations primarily along the lateral edge for decreased stiffness here, contrasting with a robust structure on the medial section. These combined elements ensure a gentle touchdown experience as well as gradual control over pronation, all without disrupting comfort or introducing abrupt shifts during movement.
The 860 v14’s plate isn’t just about defining that angled wedge, however, says Paul Zielinski, senior global product manager at New Balance. Research in their lab revealed that midsole foams stretch under force when the foot is pronating far or at high velocity. The plate, Zielinski says, “Allows for the foam to be a little more structured, and not stretch or shear as much. Working in combination with the two different midsole hardness foams, this system is helping stabilize the structure of the platform so the foot feels guided all the way from heel to toe.”
Additional midsole foam under the forefoot due to a lower heel-toe drop, a beveled heel, and an increased rocker profile provide a smooth rolling transition from midfoot to toe-off.
Ouch, my foot felt the most robust full-foot rotation support with the plate and dual-density foam among these shoes. Even though the midsole was quite plush beneath me, providing a lightweight, cushiony experience, my feet barely rolled inward. This stability feature did not bother my naturally aligned left foot, however, soon enough, I noticed some discomfort in the bones of my right knee—which tends to roll inward—since they weren't moving properly due to lack of movement. Additionally, running caused pain in the tendons surrounding my right ankle because they were struggling against the stiffer part of the midsole.
The 860 v14 offers robust midfoot support, making it less adaptable for neutral runners compared to several alternatives featured here. However, it remains an excellent option for individuals aiming to reduce pronation speed with a sneaker known for providing a seamless and pleasant experience from heel strike to push-off.
Best for Racing
Brooks Hyperion GTS 2
$140 at Amazon (Men’s) $140 at Amazon (Women’s)
Weight: 7.6 ounces (for men), 6.9 ounces (for women)
Stack Height: 31.5–23.5 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Stability Strategy: Heel stabilizers. Slim-design midsole featuring fast-return foam.
The updated second iteration of the swift Hyperion GTS features a somewhat taller layer of a novel nitrogen-enhanced EVA blend midsole material. According to Brooks, this new composition is both lighter and offers better responsiveness compared to its earlier form. During my test run, I found this claim to be accurate; the foam appeared to offer resistance as it compressed yet sprung back remarkably well, resulting in an energetic feel that encouraged me to increase my speed.
Similar to other GTS models within the Brooks lineup, the Hyperion GTS 2 includes stabilizing guide rails positioned alongside the sides of the heel and midfoot—these consist of an elevated section of midsole foam near the medial part of the foot intended to minimize excessive inward or outward movement during runs, particularly when fatigue sets in toward the end. During my run, these components were not noticeable until I appreciated the absence of instability at the back of the shoe. What stood out more significantly was the sensation of being securely grounded due to the low-profile midsole design, wider platform, and firm feel underfoot, which facilitated swift steps and reliable takeoffs.
The ground feel is quite substantial, nonetheless. The foam provides smooth cushioning and offers a comfortable experience regardless of your speed, which makes these shoes ideal for everyday training for those who do not favor a high, soft sensation beneath their feet, a characteristic that has become almost standard in the market today. However, most runners will find the Hyperion GTS 2 to be lightweight and bouncy. non-plated , an upbeat trainer and racer that doesn't pound your feet into the ground and provides gentle support when needed in the latter miles. An added bonus is the newly designed, breathable mesh upper.
Best for Up-Tempo Days
Saucony Tempus 2
$160 at Running Warehouse (For Men) $160 at Running Warehouse (For Women)
Weight: 8.2 ounces (for women); 9.4 ounces (for men)
Stack Height: 33–25 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Stability Strategy: Frame designed with an over-under approach, incorporating strategically placed supportive foams.
The Tempus sits at the acute end of the stability continuum, offering a dynamic riding experience that made me feel agile, springy, and swift—all while maintaining directional control and comfort. The key to this shoe lies within its midsole; it incorporates ultra-lightweight, highly cushioned, and supremely rebounding Pebax foam, typically known for instability, but encased in a firmer, more stable EVA structure.
Utilizing a sturdier framework to manage softer foam's compression isn’t novel or distinctive. Typically, most designs featuring such frameworks encase the entire base of the shoe with harder materials. This approach ensures stability but leads to more rigid landings and may speed up the foot’s motion upon impact at the sole’s outer edge before rotating internally. Conversely, the Tempus incorporates an innovative over-under structure where the frame rests above the flexible Pebax in the heel area, spans beneath the complete midsole thickness through the arch region, and extends underneath the Pebax section towards the front part of the shoe, running alongside the lower borders all the way to the toes.
This frame harnesses its magical properties through the strategic placement of Pebax at the base of the heel. Its flexibility helps mitigate the unsteadiness from the footwear upon contact with the ground. As pressure is applied, it flexibly bends and reshapes itself, ensuring a seamless roll-forward motion as your foot moves naturally toward the toes. Simultaneously, the stiffer structure enveloping the upper part of the heel cradles and aligns your foot over the platform securely. Underneath the middle section of the arch, an all-encompassing rigid support minimizes rotational movement and provides necessary reinforcement. In the forefoot area, direct beneath where your feet land, you experience the responsive qualities of Pebax, complemented by slightly firm foam below which lends stability during push-off phases.
The revised engineered mesh upper in version 2 secures the midfoot more effectively, improving the bond between the foot and the shoe as well as the footwear's capability to excel at high speeds.
While running, the Tempus stood out as offering one of the most enjoyable and fun riding experiences among the group. It was also particularly adept at addressing my different stability requirements. The flexible Pebax material used in the heel allowed both feet to maintain a natural, slightly outward-rolled stance upon impact, avoiding the inward twisting experienced with some shoes having stiffer, flared heels. During the mid-foot roll, this footwear offered adequate support to my more mobile right foot—support that was barely noticeable—but still permitted the necessary pronation for proper knee function. For my naturally aligned left foot, there wasn’t any excessive control or stiffness; instead, it felt consistently comfortable and reactive thanks to the Pebax cushioning underneath.
The Tempus stands out with a slimmer build in the heel and midfoot region compared to typical stability shoes. Instead of relying heavily on extra cushioning, it uses a firm structure for arch support. However, it widens significantly towards the forefoot area. Additionally, this shoe features a lower profile upfront which enhances the sense of contact with the ground needed for an effective and dynamic toe-off. Its flexibility ensures a smooth rolling motion regardless of your running speed or foot placement. Throughout various paces, I found the shoe to be quite reactive and speedy without compromising its supportive elements. Over time, my appreciation grew for how well it facilitated controlled movement from side to side and smoothly directed each step forward.
The Tempus works well as both a lively everyday trainer and a dependable choice for marathons, particularly for those seeking the responsiveness of Pebax along with added support over extended distances. It also serves as a great option for long-distance training runs aimed at races involving carbon-plated performance shoes.
Best for Going Long
Mount to Coast P1
$160 for Mount to Coast (Men’s) $160 for Mount to Coast (Women’s)
Weight: 9.9 ounces (equivalent to men’s size 9, or women’s size 10.5)
Stack Height: 37–27 mm
Drop: 10 mm
Stability Strategy: Directing geometry with an integrated midsole insert. Supportive arch wrapping. Centralized insole positioning.
Mount to Coast is a newly established brand focused on crafting footwear specifically designed for ultramarathon runners. However, based on my personal experience with their shoes, I find that they offer comfort and utility even if you're not logging miles throughout the entire day.
The P1, part of Mount to Coast’s stability line, features the same nitrogen-infused, PEBA-based midsole technology present in their other models. R1 racer , offering a gentle, springy, and pliable experience that seems more attuned than one would expect from a 37-millimeter heel. The reactive foam, which is calibrated to be stiffer compared to the PEBA used in ultra-running shoes, delivers cushioned support with quick firmness for better contact with the ground beneath your feet. This creates an effortless stride that promotes a nearly barefoot sensation along with natural movement and terrain awareness—without sacrificing shock absorption during hard impacts.
The design draws inspiration from minimalism, mirroring the contours of the foot with a close-fitting heel and a secure strap across the mid-foot area before widening into a flared front part near the big toe, offering ample space and a steady base for a completely spread-out foot. This steadiness is further improved by a curved piece of bendable plastic running from the center of the sole to beneath the large toe, supplying extra reinforcement along the typical rotational movement during forefoot motion. Research conducted by Mount to Coast suggests that minimizing unnecessary forefoot rotation holds greater importance compared to addressing heel rotation, which many traditional stabilizing footwear designs prioritize. Their innovation reportedly enhances overall foot positioning and aids in engaging the arch muscles effectively.
Using the P1 model, the footwear provided a seamless heel-to-toe roll, along with a slight added stiffness beneath the forefoot, aiding in maintaining stability during takeoff. However, what stood out most was the dual-zone innersole that securely held my heel in place and the integrated arch support within the upper section combined with the laces, giving me the sensation of having my foot meticulously bandaged for sports—a snug fit that adjusted dynamically as my foot moved throughout each step.
The adaptable P1 remained unobtrusive when I increased my speed, yet it didn’t seem to lessen the exertion like certain rocker-shaped designs tend to do. On longer runs, though, it enabled me to swiftly settle into an easy, effective cadence that effortlessly produced mile after mile, making me naturally prolong my workouts for as long as possible.
Best for Recovery Days
Hoka Gaviota 5
$175 at REI (Men’s) $175 at REI (Women’s)
Weight: 9.1 ounces (for women); 10.9 ounces (for men)
Stack Height: 34-28 mm (for women); 36-30 mm (for men)
Drop: 6 mm
Stability Strategy: Soft foam H-frame. Broad and linear design. Lateral panels.
Even with their elevated stack heights, Hoka’s footwear has consistently offered built-in stability thanks to their broad base, minimal heel-to-toe drop, and a secure heel cage integrated into the upper part above the midsole. Over the years, their stable designs have incorporated a "J-frame" feature for enhanced rotation management. This component consists of denser foam extending along the entire length of the medial side of the midsole and curving round toward the outer underside of the shoe.
The updated Gaviota 5 keeps the spacious design and elevated side walls, replacing the J-frame with an H-frame instead. A thinner, lower-density foam sits atop the midsole and wraps around the edges of the shoe, forming an 'H' pattern through a connecting strip in the center. When your foot presses down into this upper layer, it settles further within the supportive structure formed by the higher-sided base below. According to Hoka, using the H-frame enables them to incorporate softer materials without compromising support, thereby boosting comfort particularly near the sole of the foot.
While on the move, the structure became nearly imperceptible, noticeable mainly through an impression of balance as I settled into the soft sole. Nonetheless, along with the generous girth and snug fit provided by the pliable yet firm creel jacquard upper, this proved sufficient to prevent the thickly padded footwear from seeming unstable. Although it makes no claim about limiting internal twisting, the overall steadiness across the entire foot ensured that both my feet and knees felt securely supported regardless of the duration of the run.
Post a Comment