AIQezsnYmvqnwTj0YiBWJ3qMosGdbEJBetfjV8gm
Bookmark

Trump's Tariffs May Take the Biggest Toll on These U.S. States

Donald Trump Has significantly shifted American trade policy, introducing significant new tariffs on several of the United States' largest trading partners, even those that are close allies, with indications of further actions planned.

Several of these targeted nations have retaliated by imposing their own reciprocal tariffs, with certain economists warning that this might escalate into a full-blown global trade war.

drive the U.S. economy into a recession.

Nevertheless, although each U.S. state will experience some impact, certain states are likely to suffer more significantly. Trade specialists informed Pawonation.com The effect will probably vary based on closeness to either the Mexican or Canadian border, the degree of dependence on imported energy sources, and if it faces retaliatory actions from international adversaries specifically aimed at red states in America.

Pawonation.com reached out to the U.S. Department of Commerce for their input through an emailed message on Saturday during non-working hours.

Trump's Tariffs

After returning to the White House, Trump has introduced a range of new tariffs, asserting they are essential for revitalizing American manufacturing and addressing what he sees as the unfair economic practices inflicted upon the U.S. by other nations.

In early March, the Trump administration initiated new 25 percent tariffs on all produce from Mexico and Canada, except oil from north of the border, as well as an additional 10 percent tariff on trade with China. Canada and China swiftly hit back with their own retaliatory tariffs.

Trump said the tariffs would remain in place until Mexico and Canada cracked down on illegal immigration and fentanyl smuggling over their respective borders, though in Canada's case the quantities are small and its unclear how this is to be measured.

The tariffs imposed on Mexico and Canada were reduced shortly after being introduced Trump initially announced that the automotive sector would be exempted for a month, followed by stating that this exemption would extend to all Mexican and Canadian goods covered under the USMCA free trade agreement, which he had endorsed in 2018.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford stated that due to the newly imposed tariffs, he would be implementing a 25 percent additional charge on electricity sold to the U.S., prompting Trump to increase the tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum to 50 percent. Following assurances of an upcoming meeting with U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, Ford made this announcement. suspend this measure for now , and Trump took similar action on steel and aluminum.

Trump did still introduce a new 25 percent tariff on steel and aluminium covering the rest of the world, vowed to introduce new tariffs targeting the European Union in April and warned of imposing a 200 percent alcohol tax in the block as an answer to a tax on American whiskey.

Geographical Proximity

Speaking to Pawonation.com Gary Clyde Hufbauer, a trade specialist and nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, noted that states located next to Canada or Mexico may experience significant impacts.

This would encompass states like Michigan, Minnesota, and New York along the northern border, as well as Texas, Arizona, and California in the southern part.

Hufbauer stated, “There’s a robust empirical correlation in trade where proximity plays a crucial role. To put it differently, nations located near each other engage in significantly higher levels of trade compared to those separated by greater distances. This principle also applies to state and provincial exchanges within a single nation.”

It is reasonable to forecast that states adjacent to Canada and those next to Mexico will, on average, experience more significant impacts compared to inland states.

Based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau, Texas conducts more trade with Mexico than any other state, with approximately $200 billion in combined imports and exports exchanged annually. Coming in behind Texas is California at roughly $40 billion, and then Arizona at nearly $20 billion.

Data from the Office of Technology Assessment, which is part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, indicated that in 2022, Canada received 17.3% of total U.S. exports, amounting to $2.1 trillion. Additionally, 13.4% of all U.S. imports originated from Canada, totaling $3.2 trillion.

Farming and manufacture

Kristen Hopewell, who works as an economist and serves as the director of the University of British Columbia's Liu Institute for Global Issues, stated Pawonation.com That "no state will go unscathed from Trump's tariffs, but some will feel the impact more severely than others."

She mentioned that the "farm belt" regions such as Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Nebraska, Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin would be "significantly affected," noting: "About 85% of the potassium chloride utilized by U.S. farmers for fertilizers originates from Canada. The tariffs imposed by President Trump on potassium chloride and other resources have substantially raised expenses for these farmers—meanwhile, they encounter retaliatory tariffs from Canada, Mexico, and China, which represent their top three export destinations. Consequently, American farmers find themselves under pressure from both fronts."

Hopewell mentioned that states heavily dependent on manufacturing and the automotive sector are at risk. She stated, “Import tariffs on steel and aluminum will increase expenses for producers nationwide, diminishing their competitive edge. Consequently, this impact will be most severe for major centers of American manufacturing such as California, Texas, Illinois, Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New York, Indiana, Wisconsin, and North Carolina.”

Energy

Although Premier Ford has halted his proposed 25 percent increase in electricity rates for Michigan, Minnesota, and New York, he retains the option to reinstate this at any time or potentially terminate the electricity supply entirely. According to Jeffrey J. Schott, an economist from the Peterson Institute for International Economics, this situation remains precarious. Pawonation.com The three states are especially susceptible to reprisals from Canada within the energy industry.

Hopewell likewise cautioned U.S. states that import significant amounts of Canadian petroleum are at risk.

She stated: "The U.S. receives about 60 percent of its imported oil from Canada. Numerous American refineries, especially those located in the Midwest, are specially configured to handle heavy crude oil derived from the Alberta tar sands."

Without an easily accessible alternative source, these duties will inevitably be passed along to customers as increased costs. Residents of states such as Michigan, Wisconsin, Indiana, and Ohio will experience the most significant effects from elevated pricing resulting from Trump's tariffs.

Red States

As reported by Politico, Canada intentionally aimed at Republican In an effort to target Trump's support base, several voting states implemented certain retaliatory tariffs aimed at increasing costs for goods originating from those areas. The products subject to these tariffs encompassed fruits from Florida, home appliances from Ohio and South Carolina, as well as motorcycles from southern Pennsylvania.

The New Republic reports this information. EU executed a comparable action by emphasizing "Republican states," such as soybeans sourced from Louisiana and beef and poultry coming from Kansas and Nebraska.

Related Articles

  • Trump Official Says 'No Guarantees' US Will Avoid Recession
  • Can Nancy Pelosi Be Defeated? Saikat Chakrabarti Thinks the Time Is Ripe
  • Fox Host Confronts Trump Aid on Whether President 'Being Played' by Putin
  • Democrats Get Bad Polling News as Party Struggles to Respond to Trump

Start your unlimited Pawonation.comtrial

0

Post a Comment